We’re back!

February 23, 2022 · Posted in About the BNN · Comment 

After a pandemic-related hiatus, we’re back, and we hope to bring you articles regularly. For print subscribers, we hope to send out a single large issue in the coming months.

Review Describes Latest Findings on the Mechanisms of Psychedelic Drugs and Their Therapeutic Potential

In a 2021 review article in a special issue of the Journal of Neurochemistry devoted to “Psychedelics and Neurochemistry,” researcher Alaina M. Jaster and colleagues summarized recent findings on psychedelic drugs, including their potential as treatments for psychiatric disorders and the structural changes they produce in the brain. The review article focused on findings in humans and provided background context based on findings in animals, particularly rodents.

In the article, Jaster and colleagues write that psychedelics “have in common a battery of acute (within minutes to hours) effects in humans that include profound changes in processes related to perception, cognition, sensory processing, and mood.” They are not considered to be addictive, and recent research has identified fast-acting and long-lasting therapeutic effects of psychedelics, particularly for the treatment of depression and substance abuse.

While psychedelic drugs interact with the brain in complicated ways, the role of serotonin 5-HT2A receptors seems to be crucial to their effects. Psychedelics have classically been divided into two groups based on their chemical structures: phenethylamines (which include mescaline and its synthetic analog DOI) and tryptamines (which include psilocybin/“magic mushrooms,” DMT/ayahuasca, and ergolines like LSD, which are sometimes separated into a third category). The authors of the review highlight that other substances with different chemical structures that do not fit into this classification can also function as psychedelics. Examples include efavirenz and quipazine, which both activate serotonin 5-HT2A receptors and change rodent behavior in the same way that other psychedelic drugs do. These drugs are providing new directions for research into how psychedelics work at both serotonin 5-HT2A receptors and monoaminergic G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).

An image from the review article shows the effects of various psychedelic drugs on different receptors.

Rodent studies are often used to investigate how psychedelic drugs work. Rodent behaviors such as ear scratching and head twitching increase when the rodents are given drugs that have psychedelic effects in humans. These behaviors return to normal when rodents are given drugs that function as serotonin 5-HT2A receptor antagonists, preventing the stimulation of these serotonin receptors.

While it has been established that serotonin 5-HT2A receptors play an important role in the hallucinogenic effects of psychedelic drugs, how serotonin receptors are involved in some of the therapeutic effects of psychedelics, such as antidepressant effects and changes to synaptic plasticity, is not yet clear.

According to the review, “A number of studies in animal models as well as postmortem human brain samples from subjects with depression and controls has provided evidence that mood disorders occur in conjunction with a reduction in the density of dendritic spines, particularly in the frontal cortex.” Dendrites are the projections from the cell bodies of neurons upon which nerve endings from the axons of other neurons synapse. The surface of these dendrites is covered in mushroom-shaped spines that help create these synaptic connections. The review describes in vitro and in vivo research on mice that suggests that the psychedelics DOI, DMT, and LSD can remodel dendritic spines.

At a recent scientific meeting, researcher Javier González-Maeso, one of the authors of the review, described findings from a recent study of mice given DOI. The structure of the dendritic spines in the prefrontal cortex changed rapidly in these mice. They had also been conditioned to produce a fear response, and the extinction process to get rid of this learned fear was sped up in the mice given DOI. These effects occurred via the serotonin 5-HT2 receptors. The exposure to the psychedelic also affected the regulation of genes involved in synaptic assembly for days, suggesting that epigenetic-induced changes in synaptic plasticity may underlie some of the long-lasting therapeutic effects of psychedelics.

The review also addressed “microdosing,” the recreational practice of consuming small amounts of psychedelics such as psilocybin or LSD, based on the theory that amounts too small to create a hallucinogenic effect may instead produce therapeutic results. The authors find limited data to support microdosing. Most studies in humans and rodents have found no effect or, in the case of one rat study, a worsening of dendritic spine density following microdosing.

Psilocybin Comparable to Escitalopram in the Treatment of Depression

March 2, 2022 · Posted in Peer-Reviewed Published Data, Potential Treatments · Comment 
ingredient in magic mushrooms may treat depression

Four randomized, controlled clinical trials have established that psilocybin, the hallucinogenic compound in “magic mushrooms,” has anti-depressant effects. Recently, a phase 2 clinical trial compared the effects of psilocybin to a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved treatment for depression, the selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) escitalopram. The study by Robin Carhart-Harris and colleagues was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2021.

The 59 participants in the 6-week study, which took place in the United Kingdom, had longstanding moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder. They were randomized to two groups. The psilocybin group received two separate doses of 25 mg of psilocybin 3 weeks apart, plus 6 weeks of daily placebo. The escitalopram group received two separate doses of 1 mg of psilocybin 3 weeks apart plus 6 weeks of daily oral escitalopram. (The small doses of psilocybin administered to the escitalopram group were assumed to have negligible psychiatric effects.) All participants were told they would receive psilocybin (though not the dose) in order to standardize their expectations.

In addition to the drug treatments, all participants also received psychological support, which consisted of monitoring immediately after the administration of the drugs (given the expectation that the 25mg dose of psilocybin would produce an “altered quality of conscious experience”), psychological debriefings, and an active listening session.

Psilocybin improved depression symptoms to a greater extent than escitalopram did. Among the participants, 70% of the psilocybin group responded to the treatment, compared with 48% of the escitalopram group. Remission occurred in 57% of the psilocybin group compared with 28% of the escitalopram group. These differences in the outcomes for the two groups were not statistically significant.

The FDA has designated psilocybin a “Breakthrough Therapy” for severe depression, which indicates that the therapy may be a substantial improvement over existing therapies for a serious condition. The designation is intended to speed up the drug development and review process.

The state of Oregon legalized psilocybin-assisted therapy in 2020.

MDMA Superior to Placebo in Treatment of Severe PTSD

February 23, 2022 · Posted in Peer-Reviewed Published Data, Potential Treatments · Comment 
post traumatic stress disorder

An article by researcher Jennifer M. Mitchell and colleagues published in the journal Nature in 2021 reported that MDMA was more effective than placebo at treating severe post-traumatic stress disorder in an 18-week phase 3 clinical trial.

The article reported on a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-site trial that took place in the US, Canada, and Israel. Participants in the trial had severe PTSD, and in some cases also had dissociation, depression, a history of alcohol or substance use disorders, or childhood trauma. In the trial, 91 participants were required to stop any current psychiatric medications for a “washout” period, and then were randomized to either a group that received 12 therapy sessions plus placebo or a group that received 12 therapy sessions and 3 doses of MDMA, which were administered in a clinical setting.

Two months after the last therapy session, participants who had received MDMA during the trial showed greater reductions in PTSD symptoms and less functional impairment than those who were assigned to the placebo group during the trial. At the endpoint of the study, 67% of participants in the MDMA group no longer met the criteria for a PTSD diagnosis, compared to 32% of the placebo group.

Side effects that were more prevalent among the MDMA group were typically transient and mild to moderate in severity. These included muscle tightness, decreased appetite, nausea, sweating, feeling cold, and increased blood pressure and heartrate. The MDMA group did not show any increases in drug abuse or suicidality compared with the placebo group, and MDMA had similar effects among those participants with and without comorbid conditions. The authors concluded that MDMA was highly efficacious, safe, and well-tolerated as a treatment for PTSD and urged that further study of the treatment be done without delay.

Currently, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved treatments for PTSD include the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) sertraline and paroxetine, but approximately half of PTSD patients do not respond to these drugs or to evidence-based trauma-specific psychotherapy or cognitive-behavioral therapies. The FDA has designated MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD a “Breakthrough Therapy.” This designation indicates that the therapy may be a substantial improvement over existing therapies for a serious condition, and is intended to speed up the drug development and review process.

MDMA (or 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) is the same chemical used recreationally under the name ecstasy or molly. However, the positive effects in the trial followed careful dosing (which is impossible with street drugs) and targeted therapy sessions.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Induces Gray-Matter Increases in Depression

July 1, 2021 · Posted in Potential Treatments · Comment 
tDCS

At the 2021 meeting of the Society of Biological Psychiatry (SOBP), researcher Mayank Jog and colleagues described a study of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in 59 patients with moderate depression. The patients received either tDCS sessions that delivered electrical current at 2mA for 20 minutes or a same-length sham stimulation delivered using a double-blind stimulator, for a total of 12 sessions over 12 consecutive working days. Jog and colleagues found that compared to the sham stimulation, tDCS induced increases in gray matter volume in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) target area, with a statistically large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.3). The researchers plan to follow up this study that found structural changes to the brain after tDCS with more research on the antidepressant effects of the treatment.

Good Outcomes Among Patients with Major Depressive Disorder Treated with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in a Large Study

June 25, 2021 · Posted in Potential Treatments · Comment 
rTMS treatment

At the 2021 meeting of the Society of Biological Psychiatry (SOBP), researcher Harold Sackeim and colleagues reported on data collected from patients in clinical treatment for major depression who received transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at 103 practice sites. A total of 5,010 depressed patients were included in the intent-to-treat sample, and 3,814 completed the study, meaning that they either reached remission or were treated at least 20 times and went through a final assessment. “Response (58–83%) and remission (28–62%) rates were notably high across self-report and clinician-administered assessments,” and women had better outcomes than men.  Sackeim and colleagues concluded, “Strong efficacy and the low side effect and medical risk profile suggest that TMS be evaluated as a first-line treatment for [major depressive disorder].”

Accelerated Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (aiTBS) Quickly Improved Treatment-Resistant Depression

June 21, 2021 · Posted in Potential Treatments · Comment 
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

At the 2021 meeting of the Society of Biological Psychiatry (SOBP), researcher Nolan Williams and colleagues described a sham-controlled trial of accelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation (aiTBS) in patients with treatment-resistant depression. Theta burst stimulation is a specific protocol for rTMS, or repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation, a non-invasive form of brain stimulation. Magnets placed on a patient’s head provide bursts of high-frequency stimulation to the brain.

Participants in the study received 50 sessions over 5 days of either aiTBS or a sham procedure. Among those who received the real aiTBS treatment, 85.7% saw an improvement in their treatment-resistant depression, compared to only 26.7% of those in the sham group. AiTBS produced a rapid antidepressant response, which Williams and colleagues suggest could be useful for the treatment of patients in emergency rooms or inpatient settings.

Transcranial Near-Infrared Light May Treat Brain Injury and Neurodegeneration

June 15, 2021 · Posted in Potential Treatments · Comment 

At the 2021 meeting of the Society of Biological Psychiatry, there was a symposium on treatment with near-infrared light chaired by researchers Paolo Cassano and Dan Iosifescu. The treatment is known as transcranial photobiomodulation (PBM) with near-infrared light. A device worn on the head delivers infrared light that penetrates the cerebral cortex and can modulate cortical excitability. It has a variety of effects including promoting neuroplasticity, improving oxygenation, and decreasing inflammation and oxidative stress.

These studies used near infrared light.

A number of studies exploring the possibility that PBM could be used as a clinical treatment for conditions such as depression, brain injury, or dementia were presented at the symposium.

Researcher Lorelei Tucker discussed promising findings from an animal model in which rats with stroke or brain injuries showed improvement after being treated with PBM. 

Cassano discussed studies aimed at refining which brain areas should be targeted with PBM and how much light should be delivered in order to improve depression. In double-blind, sham-controlled studies in people with major depression, targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with PBM improved their symptoms.

Researcher Benjamin Vakoc discussed a study of low-level light therapy (LLLT) using near-infrared light compared to a sham procedure in 68 people with moderate traumatic brain injury. The researchers used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess changes in white matter in the brain over time in people recovering from an acute brain injury. Patterns of changes in white matter were different for those who received LLLT compared to those who received the sham procedure.

Researcher Linda Chao described a very small study to determine whether PBM could improve symptoms of dementia. Four patients received typical dementia care while four others underwent home treatments with the commercially available Vielight Neuro Gamma device, which delivers PBM via both the scalp and an insert in the nose. After 12 weeks, the PBM group showed improvements in cognition and brain connectivity.

The Vielight Neuro Gamma device

Editor’s Note: We will be watching the literature to follow advances in this promising novel method of neuromodulation.

Participation in Sports May Mitigate Genetic Risk for ADHD in School-Aged Children

June 9, 2021 · Posted in Risk Factors · Comment 

At the 2021 meeting of the Society of Biological Psychiatry, researcher Keiko Kunitoki and colleagues reported that participation in sports decreased behavior abnormalities in 9- and 10-year-old children at genetic risk for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Sports were associated with greater hippocampal volume, which was associated with fewer behavioral abnormalities. Kunitoki and colleagues concluded that “participation in team sports mitigated genomic risk for psychopathology at age 9–10 in part through increased hippocampal volume.”

Editor’s Note: These data are consistent with a program called the Vermont Family-Based Approach developed by researcher James Hudziak, who heads the Vermont Center for Children, Youth and Families at the University of Vermont. The program encourages families to practice different domains of wellness, such as music, mindfulness, exercise, and nutrition, among others. The idea is to support emotional and behavioral health, and to do so intensively in families where children show signs of mood and behavioral difficulties or are at risk for these difficulties.

Hudziak analyzed brain scans of 232 children aged 6 to 18 and reported that “practicing an instrument such as the piano or violin increased working memory, gray matter volume in the brain, and the ability to screen out irrelevant noise. Practicing mindfulness increased white matter volume and reduced anxiety and depression. Exercise also increased brain volume and neuropsychological abilities.”

In 2015, researcher Benjamin I. Goldstein reported that 20 minutes of vigorous exercise on a bike improved cognition and decreased hyperactivity in the medial prefrontal cortex in adolescents with and without bipolar disorder, and researcher Danella M. Hafeman reported that offspring of parents with bipolar disorder who exercised more had lower levels of anxiety.

To summarize, engaging in exercise, team sports, music, and meditation/mindfulness are beneficial for all children, and can be especially helpful for those at risk for depression or bipolar disorder. Children who are already symptomatic should additionally be offered something like family focused therapy (FFT), a multi-faceted approach developed by researcher David Miklowitz, in which families of young people at risk for bipolar disorder take part in therapy, learning together about the illness and practicing strategies for communication and coping.

Surface Area of Cortex Is Reduced After Multiple Manic Episodes

cortex

In a 2020 article in the journal Psychiatric Research: Neuroimaging, researcher Rashmin Achalia and colleagues described a study of structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that compared 30 people with bipolar I disorder who had had one or several episodes of mania to healthy volunteers. Compared to the healthy volunteers, people with bipolar disorder had “significantly lower surface area in bilateral cuneus, right postcentral gyrus, and rostral middle frontal gyri; and lower cortical volume in the left middle temporal gyrus, right postcentral gyrus, and right cuneus.”

The surface area of the cortex in patients with bipolar I disorder who had had a single episode of mania resembled that of the healthy volunteers, while those who had had multiple manic episodes had less cortical surface area.

The data suggest that compared to healthy volunteers, people with bipolar disorder have major losses in brain surface area after multiple episodes that are not seen in first episode patients. In addition, the researchers found that both the number of episodes and the duration of illness was correlated with the degree of deficit in the thickness in the left superior frontal gyrus. These decreases in brain measures occurred after an average of only 5.6 years of illness.

Editor’s Note:  These data once again emphasize the importance of preventing illness recurrence from the outset, meaning after the first episode. Preventing episodes may prevent the loss of brain surface and thickness.  

Clinical data has also shown that multiple episodes are associated with personal pain and distress, dysfunction, social and economic losses, cognitive deficits, treatment resistance, and multiple medical and psychiatric comorbidities. These and other data indicate that treatment after a first episode must be more intensive, multimodal, and continuous and include expert psychopharmacological and psychosocial support, as well as family education and support. Intensive treatment like this can be life-saving. The current study also supports the mantra we have espoused: prevent episodes, protect the brain and the person.

Next Page »